11.1.pdf
527.6 KB
Our motion in the 9th Circuit seeking reimbursement for legal fees from the corrupt son of Joe Biden & his corrupt attorneys.
14.1.pdf
271.3 KB
APPELLANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS AND RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION
For the first time in a long time, perhaps ever, @MarcoPolo501c3 applauds a decision entered by an Article III judge in the District Court for the District of Columbia: x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1924894521159983563
Our version of a FAQ section: https://marcopolo501c3.substack.com/p/missionandleadership
Forwarded from Marco Polo
The lawsuit by Hunter Biden against @MarcoPolo501c3 and @GarrettZ is the epitome of the cronyism that his father has used to steal and abuse others for decades. Hunter Biden filed a civil lawsuit under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA"), a criminal statute which criminalizes "hacking" (the illegal intrusion into a computer belonging to a 3rd party without permission). But Hunter Biden's lawsuit does not describe one instance in which such an intrusion took place, much less one that he could even plausibly claim to be committed by Marco Polo or Ziegler—no date of any alleged "hack" given; no single action by Marco Polo described; and certainly not a single "hacked" third-party computer identified. No, Biden claims that he's been hacked solely because Marco Polo possesses and published files, emails, pictures and videos. Essentially, Biden is claiming we misappropriated his "data," without ever addressing how others published materials well before Marco Polo. Likewise, Biden does not even admit that the materials in our publications were obtained from a copy of the laptop he abandoned in Delaware. As icing on the cake, the corrupt District Court judge assigned to this case, Hernan Vera, recently issued an order that acknowledged Hunter's case is about misappropriation of data. He did so while conveniently ignoring precedent from his own Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which already ruled clearly that the CFAA is not a misappropriation statute for property; rather, it is designed to prevent intrusion into another computer without permission. And that's something Hunter cannot prove. We need help to fend off this lawfare: FightBiden.org