https://www.generalflynn.com/general-flynns-books
👻🇺🇸🎅🏼

Xlink 🔗

Of course, the Democrats' chief lawfare goober Norm Eisen is involved.

BTW, Trump is 21-0 with the SCOTUS in 2025.

Funny thing, SCOTUS precedent. Their decision (guided by the doctrine of stare decisis, Latin for "to stand by things decided"). And that matters, b/c their decisions are considered the supreme form of judicial authority in the US legal system. While there are a number of reasons why that's impt, the key one is that said decisions serve as THE binding interpretation of our Constitution.

Now, given the absolute gravity of the moment, would it not make sense to secure SCOTUS decisions on certain relevant matters that would arguably be entirely germane to what's happening big picture? And for that matter, what comes next?

The reason the latter part is, IMO, super impt b/c what's being done right now to right the ship of state has to be judged by and considered lawful/Constitutional by history.

Legitimacy would be essential if one were taking extreme measures to save our Republic.