Hypothetical:

An event occurs.

Either:
X happened
or
Y happened

But nobody knows with 100% certainty which one it was. At this point, it’s all speculation.

In response, some say:
“I think X happened, but I’m open to being wrong,”
or
“I think Y happened based on the information I’ve seen, but I’m willing to change my mind if better evidence comes along.”

And others say:
“I think X happened, and anyone who doesn’t think X is a brainwashed idiot who’s fallen off the deep end,”
or
“I think Y happened, and anyone who doesn’t think Y is controlled opposition working to mislead you.”

Which of these ways of speaking indicates openness? Which indicates critical thinking? Which indicates genuine truth-seeking? Which shows humility in the face of uncertainty? Which fosters dialogue and growth? Which shuts down inquiry and hardens into dogma?

They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk. | Candace Ep 235
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czVBmqZP6Ss

Think you own your land? Think again. Look no further than Washington State where a family ranch held for generations is being stripped away under the guise of “wetlands protection”. Decades old manmade ponds are suddenly “natural habitats” and Google Earth is the government’s evidence. What does this mean for you and I moving forward? https://youtu.be/vG2nMzRUiKg

The survey highlights the industry’s key challenges: retaining, supporting, and developing a workforce facing turnover, burnout, and dissatisfaction.

Read the article for free👇
https://theepochtim.es/v262y6

1934 - Carnegie Plan

TCM supports spleen and liver function to boost detoxification and metabolism, helping reduce the health risks of microplastics.

Read the article for free👇
https://theepochtim.es/es903x