𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
Early names' list of KJB Translators:
Part 2 of Early Names of KJB Translators (on the KJB's New Testament's translators) [the names are typed out belowπŸ‘‡]

"The places & Perfons agreed upon for the Greek

Westminister

The Epfes [Epistles] of St. Paul.
Dean of Chester
Dr Hutchenson
Dr Spencer
Mr. Fenton

The Canonicall Epfes [Epistles]
Mr. [Qabbitt or Rabbitt? -see the picture here to see the name of this translator]
Mr. Sanderfon [Sanderson]
Mr. Dakeins


Ox [Oxford]

The 4 Gospells [refering to the 4 books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John]
Deane of Christchurch
Deane of Winchester
Deane of Worchester
Deane of Windfore"

πŸ›‘All About The KJB Translators Go-To List [Link]
πŸ‘‰πŸ»[πŸ’ͺThe Ultimate ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 Guide to King James I, 
Erasmus, the KJB Translators, the KJB itself, and more - Go-To List
]πŸ‘ˆπŸ»

𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
πŸ‘2
𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 pinned Β«Part 2 of Early Names of KJB Translators (on the KJB's New Testament's translators) [the names are typed out belowπŸ‘‡] "The places & Perfons agreed upon for the Greek Westminister The Epfes [Epistles] of St. Paul. Dean of Chester Dr Hutchenson Dr Spencer…»
Both King James I and the KJB Translators wanted "one more exact translation of the holy Scriptures into the Englifh tongue" (The Holy Bible/1611 KJB, The Epiftle Dedicatorie on Page 6 out of 1506), and the Holy Bible (which was and is also called from 1900s to today as the KJB) was translated from 1604-1611. This demolishes modern versionsists' claims of "King James I would support all modern versions and constant new translations".

Also, the KJB Translators knew that "we [we= the KJB Translators] shall be traduced by Papifh [Papish] perfons at home or abroad" (Roman Catholics) and "we shall be maligned by [self] felfe-conceited brethen". The KJB Translators knew both each other and King James I, and they foresaw the many accusations that people today make up on the KJB and King James I

𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 & ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱π”₯𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰π”ͺ
πŸ†1
Audio
The KJB translators did not promote modern versions but wrote:

" Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one (for then the imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that our people had been fed with gall of dragons instead of wine, with whey instead of milk); but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one, not justly to be excepted against."
(Page 16)

The notes never go against the KJB or the KJB Only position at all.

The KJB translators simply said they wanted to make a good one better, and out of many translations one principle good one. Nothing about for or against KJB Only in the above quote from Page 16 of the KJB Preface.

(Extra note: the KJB only position is use KJB only & this position is for English speakers & readers only; everybody else should read the Bible in their own langauge that they speak and read in)

𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 & ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱π”₯𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰π”ͺ
πŸ†1
If King James the first quoted both the Apostles John and Paul to prove his stance against fornication why would you think he'd be ok with fornicating with another male?

This is what he had to say on the matter:

"Heare God commanding by the mouth of Paul, to abstaine from fornication, declaring that the fornicator shall not inherite the Kingdome of heauen: and by the mouth of Iohn, reckoning our fornication amongst other grieuous sinnes, that debarre the committers amongst dogs and swine, from entry in that spirituall and heauenly Ierusalem"
Basil Number 34 of the Basilikon Doron.

King James also used the Apostle John and Paul's words to expose those that ungodly commit fornication as:

"grievous sins calling them, dogs and swine"


Basil Number 14 of the Basilikon Doron.

Revelation 22:15 [New Testament] ¹⁢¹¹ᐟᴷᴢⱽ

¹⁡ For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoeuer loueth and maketh a lie.


𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
πŸ†4πŸ‘2
Ephesians 5:5 [New Testament] ¹⁢¹¹ᐟᴷᴢⱽ

⁡ For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor vncleane person, nor couetous man who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdome of Christ, and of God.


Galatians 5:19-21 [New Testament] ¹⁢¹¹ᐟᴷᴢⱽ

¹⁹ Nowe the workes of the flesh are manifest, which are these, adulterie, fornication, vncleannesse, lasciuiousnesse,
²⁰ Idolatrie, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Β²ΒΉ Enuyings, murthers, drunkennesse, reuellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I haue also tolde you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherite the kingdome of God.


𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
πŸ†3πŸ‘2
𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 pinned Β«Ephesians 5:5 [New Testament] ¹⁢¹¹ᐟᴷᴢⱽ ⁡ For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor vncleane person, nor couetous man who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdome of Christ, and of God. Galatians 5:19-21 [New Testament] ¹⁢¹¹ᐟᴷᴢⱽ ¹⁹ Nowe the…»
πŸ’ͺThe Ultimate ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 Guide to King James I,
Erasmus, the KJB Translators, the KJB itself, and more - Go-To List

βš”Contrary to internet claims+ lies+rumors, King James I was NOT a Freemason & was NOT in the occult or any secret societies - Go-To List: [Link]
πŸ›‘All About The KJB Translators Go-To List [Link]
🀴King James I's Christian Character Go-To List- Complete Go-To List with Part 1 and Part 2 to show much information on King James I🀴 [Link]
πŸ‘‰Refuting False Allegations that falsely claim King James I was a homosexual/sodomite, a witch/sorceror, a Mason, and/or a murderer of Baptists - Go To List
πŸ“–Refuting False Claims & Rumors That Lie About the King James Bible  Go-To ListπŸ“– [Link]
πŸ“œDefending Erasmus against the corrupt Critical Text/Vaticanus+Sinaiticus/Nestle Aland/UBS Text Promoters and the Modern Versionists' Lying Narrative - Go-To List [Link]πŸ“œ
πŸ“šπŸ“šBased Books written by King James I Go-To List [Link]
πŸ“šExtra Books about King James I, the KJB Translators, and the KJB Go-To List (these are not written by James I or the KJB Translators but have helpful information) [Link]
βœπŸ“šKing James I was a polyglot, multilingual speaker and knew, read, & spoke in the following 6 languages (Go-To List) [Link]

[πŸ’ͺThe Ultimate ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 Guide to King James I, 
Erasmus, the KJB Translators, the KJB itself, and more - Go-To List
]

Follow us at
𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 @TheRealKingJamesI
πŸ†3
𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 pinned Β«πŸ’ͺThe Ultimate ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀 Guide to King James I, Erasmus, the KJB Translators, the KJB itself, and more - Go-To List βš”Contrary to internet claims+ lies+rumors, King James I was NOT a Freemason & was NOT in the occult or any secret societies - Go-To…»
Erasmus was against backtranslating from Latin into Greek

He mentioned he did not do that practice in the book of Revelation in its Revelation 22:16-22 (Revelation's last 6 verses):

Non his contentus, impingit mihi flagitium impium, idque ante tempus, videlicet frequenter insulciens, si quid habet odiosius, quod in fine Apocalypsis, paucula verba adiecerim Graeco codici ex nostris Latinis.

(See Page 85 out of 630)

β€œNot content with that, he [Lee] accused me of an impious crime.... that in the end of the Book of Revelation I added a small number of words in a Greek codex from our Latin copies”

(Opera, ix, 1706, col. 150)

[ Archive Link ]

Thus, Erasmus did not backtranslate at all and anyone who claims "Erasmus backtranslated [insert verse(s) names]" is a liar.

π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ | ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱π”₯𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰π”ͺ | 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
❀2
2025/10/16 01:42:02
Back to Top
HTML Embed Code: