Telegram Web Link
Forwarded from hugo1991
但係佢話呢d goods is not included in closing inventory
Forwarded from 看起來更大更威脅的小熊貓
係啊,但因為未做closing entries,你數返入去就得
Forwarded from hugo1991
即係因為而家係發生在未做inventory counting
Forwarded from 看起來更大更威脅的小熊貓
嚴格黎講係做咗,但做完條數未做相應既double entries
Forwarded from hugo1991
但係如果係咁嘅話唔係應該要做cogs adjustment 咩? 因為本身未count入去個inventory 度, 所以cost of good sold會大咗
Forwarded from 看起來更大更威脅的小熊貓
而家係有個數字喺度,但嗰數字未入books
Forwarded from 看起來更大更威脅的小熊貓
Inventory count還inventory count,closing entries還closing entries
Forwarded from 看起來更大更威脅的小熊貓
唔係你數完條數就自動入COGS account,你鍾意既數完返check一次先開始做income statement (ie 開始做closing entries) 都得架
BAFS你問我答channel pinned «導師們仍然砌緊2021既版本,翻炒個2020版本出黎先: ‼️溫習注意事項、資源、2019及2020Mock、BAFS 最後階段提點 👉🏻本群組2021 Mock (2021年3月21日發佈版本) 👉🏻本群組2020 Mock - 只設卷2A會計單元 未背卷一的話,係時候準備塞翻卷一既野入腦了»
Forwarded from Ace
唔好意思我好混亂,請問介唔介意解釋多d overcast /undercast 問題
over/under cast 既意思係:加總錯誤,例如 1+3 應該係4,你計左做 5的話就係overcast by $1. 你計左做 $2 就係undercast by $2。

咁你要留意邊個步驟出錯,而決定點樣改。

有一種,係sales / purchase journal overcast, 會錯其中一邊,因此改正出現suspense;上面答過,不重複。
另一種,係invoice overcast. 假設公司而家credit purchase of goods from suppliers,張purchase invoice 顯示買左3樣貨品,成本分別係 $40 + $50 + $60 。正確總數係$150

不過張 invoice overcast by $20 ,姐係公司錯誤地以為張invoice係 $170。

公司入帳係跟invoice入的。張invoice係 $170,咁入purchase journal 入左做 $170,順應地,
Dr. Purchases & Cr. trade payables 同時入左 $170

由此,更正時要同時減少 trade payables and purchases 各 $20,更正沒有suspense。

結論:唔係睇over/under cast 去判斷有無suspense,係要睇邊度出錯,究竟出錯時候有無導致Debit / Credit 金額不一樣的情況
Forwarded from hugo1991
Forwarded from hugo1991
唔明白點解point 2 會係profit and loss insurance?😥
Ref: CE2009 Q2B item (ii)

此類錯誤用字:
Accrued XX / Prepaid XX has been omitted from the G/L
Accrued XX / Prepaid XX has been brought forward as opening [debit/credit] balance // has not been brought forward

更正特點:
不會出現 Accrued XX/ Prepaid XX 在double entry內,其中一方為suspense

https://youtu.be/N2RZpZ0efdE
正確既收取定金:
Dr. Cash / Bank
Cr. Deposits from customers (Liabilities 增加)

題目的錯誤:將收取定金當作減少Trade receivables, 即係
Dr. Cash / Bank
Cr. Trade Receivables

更正分錄:
Dr. Trade Receivables
Cr. Deposits from customers (Liabilities 增加)
Forwarded from J
如果我賣一樣嘢 on credit
Dr Trade receivables
Cr sales
跟住客人畀訂金我
Dr Bank
Cr Deposit from customer
到真係交貨嗰日
Dr Deposit from customer
Cr Trade receivables
咁樣做啱唔啱?🤔
不正確。時序有錯
1. 你賣一樣野 on credit 呢個描述係指:
(a) 貨物已經出門 (delivered) , and
(b) 客戶尚未付款
由此你可以確認 sales revenue,同時記錄 Dr. Trade receivables 以反映客戶未付款

2. 客人比定金
你既描述正確。

3. 真係交貨嗰日
Dr. Deposit from customers
Cr. Sales ← 呢一日公司完成左交付貨物責任,可以確認sales revenue,故Cr. Sales 以記錄

發生事件既時序會係以下兩者其中一個可能,不會混合:
(1) 客人付定金 → 公司發貨,記錄sales revenue
(2) 公司發貨 (而客人未付款),此刻記錄sales revenue → 客人付款
Forwarded from Hh Hh
我想問如果historical cost principle no longer applicable ,我哋係應該用liquidation value instead of market value 去計算價值?
2025/07/08 20:53:21
Back to Top
HTML Embed Code: