Ibn Utheymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "The response is from two angles, one of the two:
That this is a mere action and actions don't point to obligation.
The second:
It's possible that it was due to cleanliness and to remove the blood from the face because a person is not pleased with having blood on their face, even if it was a little, so this being possible invalidates the usage of this as evidence". End of speech from Al-Mumti' (1/378).

As for the Consensuses which were relayed are just claims, the proof for this is that contrary to it has been established from some of the Salaf:

1. Ibn Abu Shaybah and At-Tabaraani in Al-Kabeef reported from Muhammad bin Sireen, from Yahya Al-Jazzaar, that he said: "Ibn Mas'uud, may Allah be pleased with him, prayed whilst he had dung and blood from a camel he slaughtered, on his stomach, and he didn't perform Wudhu".

Albaani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "Its chain of narration is authentic, they reported it from the route of Ibn Sireen, and Yahya bin Al-Jazzaar, and Ibn Abu Hatim said: "My father and Abu Zur'ah said: "Thiqqah".". End of speech from As-Saheehah (1/606).

2. The Hadith of Jaabir, which is on that Sahaabi who was an Ansaari, who the Mushriks hit with three arrows whilst he was praying, and he continued praying whilst blood was pouring from him. Reported by Ahmad (3/343), and Abu Daud (Sahih Abu Daud 193).

And the narrator who narrated it from Jaabir: Aqeel bin Jaabir, and he is Majhool Al-Haal, and he has been declared Thiqqah by Ibn Hibbaan, and this Hadith has been declared Hassan by An-Nawawi (Al-Majmuu' 2/55), and Albaani.

What's apparent from this Hadith is that the Prophet ﷺ knew of this, because it's farfetched that he wouldn't come to know of the likes of these great occurences, and it hasn't been reported that he informed him that his prayer became invalid. As stated by Ash-Shawkaani (An-Nayl (1/165).

For this reason a group from the verifiers have taken the position that nothing of the different bloods are impure except menstruation blood, and this is what's correct in-sha-Allah.

Ash-Shawkaani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said in Ad-Daraari (1/94): "As for the rest of the bloods, the evidences in it are different and they clash, and the basis of being free of culpability continues until proof comes which is free from an opposition which is more correct or similar to it...". End of speech.

And he said Wabal Al-Ghimaam (1/185):

"What assist the lack of it being impure, is him touching blood with his noble hands when marking his camel, and the lack of his rebuke upon those who sucked the blood from his injury on the day of Uhud, and his ﷺ command to leave the blood on the martyrs, and not to wash it from their bodies and clothes, and affairs which are impure are not permissible to be touched...". End of speech.

I said:
The Hadith of Maalik the father of Abu Saeed Al-Khudhri sucking the blood from the injury of the Prophet ﷺ and not spitting it out, is inauthentic, it's from the Mursal of Umar bin As-Saaib, and similarly what's reported of Ali bin Abu Talib drinking the blood of the Prophet ﷺ, and Abu Tayyibah drinking the blood of the Prophet ﷺ, all of this is unauthentic. Look in At-Talkhees Al-Habeer (17,19).

Albaani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said in As-Silsilah As-Sahihah (1/603-608): "The legislative texts only point to the impurity of menstruation blood, and besides this remains upon the basis which is agreed upon between those that differed, which is purity, and it doesn't exit this except with a text which can establish the evidence".

And he, may Allah have mercy upon him, said in commentary upon Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir when he said in his explanation of Ar-Rawdhah An-Nadiyyah: "Indeed the impurity of the menstruation blood is not because it's menstruation blood, but because it is blood, and those that follow up the Hadiths find that it was understood that blood is impure, even if there isn't a clear text in this they used to know what is disgusting and impure through the pure natural predisposition".

Albaani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "As for the statement of Ahmad Shaakir (and those that follow up the Hadiths find that it was understood that blood is impure) is a mere claim, and something which I didn't feel at all in what I came across of the Hadiths, rather I found that what invalidates this claim, as what preceded in the Hadith of the Ansaari and the narration of Ibn Mas'uud.

Similarly his statement: (they used to know what is disgusting and impure through the pure natural predisposition), I didn't know there was an entry point for the natural predisposition in knowing the impurities in the legislation, don't you see that the legislators declared the purity of semen and the impurity of pre-cum (madhi), is this something which can be known through the natural predisposition?! And similarly the majority have taken the position of the impurity of Khamr, and that it becomes pure when it turns into vinegar. Is this something which can be known through the natural predisposition?! Oh Allah! No! If only he said: "it is not something which is disgusting" and didn't add to this then it would be something that can be surrendered to". End of speech from As-Sahihah (1/608).

Shaykh Ibn Utheymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said in Al-Mumti' (1/375): "If someone said that the blood of humans are pure if it didn't exit the two exit points (of impurity), then it would be a strong position, and the proofs for this would be as follows:

1. That the basis of things is purity until evidence established that it's impure, and we don't know that he ﷺ commanded to wash blood, except menstruation, whilst many a time a person is afflicted with injuries, and nose bleeds, and Hijaamah, and other than this. If it was impure than he ﷺ would've clarified it, due to the need requiring this.

2. That the Muslims haven't ceased to pray whilst having injuries in battles, and much blood could pour out from them which is not overlooked (if it was something) and nothing was reported from him ﷺ that he commanded to wash it off, and it wasn't reported from them that they would try to avoid it severely, to the point that they would take of their clothes when they would something else to wear...

3. From analogy is that the human body parts are pure, if a hand was cut off then it would be pure, whilst it would contain blood, perhaps a lot, and if a body parts which is considered a limb on the body is pure, then the blood which becomes detached from it, and is replaced by other than it, is also - from the angle of what has more priority.

4. Humans when deceased are pure and fish when dead are pure, if you say that the blood of the fish is pure because dead fish are pure, then similarly it is said: human blood is pure because deceased humans are pure...". End of speech

🇮‌🇳‌🇩‌🇪‌🇽‌
www.tg-me.com/bashuaiben/3268

____
Translated by:
Abu Ibraheem 'Abdullaah bin Ahmed Ash-Shingaani, may Allah forgive for him, for his parents and his Mashaayikh and the rest of the Muslims.
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️The ruling on shortening and combining prayers shortly before arriving home from travelling◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

Oh Shaykh, if a traveller is travelling then he combines and shortens the Dhuhur and ‘Asr prayers shortly before arriving at his country, is the action of his valid?

📩🔸Answer:

Yes valid.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7598

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

Explanation of:

📂 The Book of Purification

From: Ad-Durar Al-Bahiyyah

Authored by: Imam Muhammad bin Ali Ash-Shawkaani (died on the 27th of Jumaada Al-Aakhar, 1250H), may Allah have mercy upon him.

Explanation by:
Shaykh Abu Hamzah Hassan Ba Shu'ayb, may Allah preserve him and protect him, and continue to delight us with his knowledge.

➖➖

2) THE RULINGS OF THE IMPURITIES:

2.18 The pig:

An-Nawawi said in Al-Majmuu' (2/568): "Ibnul-Mundhir may Allah have mercy upon him relayed a consensus of the scholars in his book Al-Ijmaa', on the impurity of the pig, and this is the foremost what's used as a proof if the Consensus was established, but the Madhab of Maalik was that the pig is pure whilst it is alive. As for what is used as a proof by the author - i.e Abu Ishaaq Ash-Shiyraazi (and his proof is that its condition is worse than that of a dog, because there is a legislative text on the impermissibility of its flesh) - it is similarly used a proof by others, and there is no proof in this, because we don't have a clear proof for the impurity of the pig whilst it is alive". End of speech.

As for the usage of the verse as evidence:

(قُل لَّآ أَجِدُ فِى مَآ أُوحِىَ إِلَىَّ مُحَرَّمًا عَلَىٰ طَاعِمٍ يَطْعَمُهُۥٓ إِلَّآ أَن يَكُونَ مَيْتَةً أَوْ دَمًا مَّسْفُوحًا أَوْ لَحْمَ خِنزِيرٍ فَإِنَّهُۥ رِجْسٌ أَوْ فِسْقًا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ ٱللَّهِ بِهِۦۚ)
"Say, "I do not find within that which was revealed to me [anything] forbidden to one who would eat it unless it be a dead animal or blood spilled out or the flesh of swine - for indeed, it is Rijs -  or it be [that slaughtered in] disobedience, dedicated to other than Allah".
[Al-An'am:145]

Is from two angles:

The first:
It being impermissible to eat, and this doesn't necessitate impurity.

The second:
His statement:
(فَإِنَّهُۥ رِجْسٌ)
"for indeed, it is Rijs".
[Al-An'am:145]

This also doesn't necessarily make it mean that it is impure, because Rijs is what's disgusting, so encompassing all that is disgusting, be it impure or what's not impure.

What clarifies it is the Hadith of Anas bin Maalik, may Allah be pleased with him, he said: "When it was the day of Khaybar, a man came and said: "I Messenger of Allah the donkeys were eaten", and then another man came and said: "All the donkeys have finished". So the Messenger of Allah ﷺ commanded Abu Talha to proclaim that Allah and His Messenger forbade you all from the flesh of the donkeys because it is Rijs or impure". So the pots containing were thrown out". Reported by Muslim.

So his statement: "Rijs". Does this point to that donkeys whilst alive are impure?

The answer without doubt is no, so similarly pigs.

So in anyway, the verse didn't come in the context of clarifying purity and impurity, rather it came in the clarification of what's permissible and impermissible. As stated by Ash-Shawkaani in "As-Sayl" (1/44).

And what the majority use as a proof for the impurity of the pig is the Hadith of Abu Tha'labah Al-Khushani, that he asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: "We live alongside the people of the Book, and they cook pig in their pots, and drink Khamr from their cups". Whereby the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "If you find other than it then eat from it and drink from it, and if you don't find other than it then wash it with water and eat from it and drink from it". Reported by Abu Daud (10/314), and the basis of the Hadith is the two Sahihs.

And the reply is that the command with washing is to remove what's impermissible to eat or drink, not that it is impure, and if we agreed to this possibility - for argument sake - then possibility doesn't raise to the level of being a proof in the area of dispute". End of speech from As-Sayl (1/38).

And they also the Hadith of Buraydah, may Allah be pleased with her, as a proof, in that the Prophet ﷺ said: "Whoever plays with dice it is like covering their hands in flesh of pig and its blood". Reported by Muslim (15/15 Nawawi) and Abu Daud (13/283), and his wording is "Dipped his hand in".

And this is not clear-cut in pointing to the impurity of the blood of the pig and its flesh, due to the possibility in the likening it to eating it, and due to this An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "And the meaning of covering their hands in flesh of pig and its blood is: during eating from it, and it is resembling it to eating it due to it being impermissible, and Allah knows best". End of speech from Sharh Muslim (15/15).

So what is most correct regarding the pig is that it is not impure as long as it is alive, as is the Madhab of Maalik and the Maalikiyyah, and it is what Ash-Shawkaani leans to in As-Sayl (2/38), contrary to it here, and Allah knows best.

🇮‌🇳‌🇩‌🇪‌🇽‌
www.tg-me.com/bashuaiben/3268

____
Translated by:
Abu Ibraheem 'Abdullaah bin Ahmed Ash-Shingaani, may Allah forgive for him, for his parents and his Mashaayikh and the rest of the Muslims.
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Purchasing property in instalments without taking a loan, but there’s charges of delay in payments◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

A brother wants to buy a flat and complete the balance over several years by paying an amount every month without taking a loan. However, if he doesn’t pay the monthly amount or delays in paying, he will be required to pay a fine.

Is this interest?

📩🔸Answer:

Yes this is interest and Allah knows best.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7601

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Saying: “Make dua for me” after giving someone charity◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

What’s the ruling on the statement from the giver of charity to the one he’s giving charity to: “Make dua for me”?

📩🔸Answer:

It’s better to leave that, because - and Allah knows best - it’s like he’s requesting from him a recompense for this charity.

Shaykhul Islām ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him said: “From a (type of) recompense is requesting for supplication”.

Allah the Most High said concerning those whom He praised:

(إِنَّمَا نُطْعِمُكُمْ لِوَجْهِ اللَّهِ لَا نُرِيدُ مِنكُمْ جَزَاءً وَلَا شُكُورًا)
“We feed you seeking Allah's Countenance only. We wish for no reward, nor thanks from you.

And supplication is a type of reward just like the Hadith:

(من أسدى إليكم معروفًا فكافئوه، فإن لم تجدوا ما تكافئونه به فادعوا له حتى تعلموا أن قد كافأتموه)
“If anyone does you goodness, then recompense him, but if you do not find what you can compensate him with, then pray for him until you feel that you have compensated him”.

Furthermore, ‘Aisha May Allah be pleased with her when she would send charity to people, she would say to the sender (on her behalf):

“Listen carefully to what they supplicate us with (when they receive the charity) so that we can (counter that) by supplicating for them the same as what they supplicate for us, so our reward remains only with Allah”. [End of speech]

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7606

📒 Clarifying the failure of Abdullah Al-Mar'i and warning from his new University.

By:
🍃Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammad Ba Shu'ayb🍃
-may Allah preserve him-

Read in channel here:
📱 www.tg-me.com/bashuaiben/2474

Pdf:
📒 www.tg-me.com/bashuaiben/2479

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

▪️Wanting to pray the Witr prayer after the Adhaan of Fajr▪️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him-.

📩🔹Question:

O Shaykh, may Allah preserve you, a man who adheres to praying a few units during the night, at the start of the night, after the Sunnah of Witr he prays a couple of units and then concludes it with the Witr.

One day he wanted to pray it before Fajr except that he woke up from his sleep during or after the Adhaan.

The question is what is legislated for him to start with, the two units Fajr or some units and then the Witr,?

📤🔸Answer:

At the Adhaan of Fajr the time for Witr ends, and he repays it at the time of Duhaa as an even number.

____
Translated by:
Abu Ibraheem 'Abdullaah bin Ahmed Ash-Shingaani

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/2317

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Should you also say the supplication of leaving the house when leaving another home you’re visiting?◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

Is the supplication for leaving the house specific to only your house? Or is it that if you went to a relative or a friend’s house for example on the same day, then you depart from them you should also say this supplication?

May Allah bless you and benefit Islām and the Muslims by way of you.

📩🔸Answer:

In the Hadith (it mentions):

(إِذَا خَرَجَ مِنْ بَيْتِهِ)
“When he would depart from his (own) house”.

This is the basis and the usual, nor is there prevention - and Allah knows best - if you were to say it from another house, especially if the stay there was long.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7610

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Is Ayaat Al-Kursi from the morning and evening remembrances?◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

Is Ayat Al-Kursi from the morning and evening remembrances?

📩🔸Answer:

What’s correct is that it’s not from it.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7610

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Saying “Ihdina Sirat (ت) Al-Mustaqeem” instead of “Ihdina Sirat (ط) Al-Mustaqeem◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

May Allah be good to you.

Does the reciting of an Imam who says:

“Ihdina Sirat (ت) Al-Mustaqeem in changing the letter (ط) with (ت) nullify the prayer?

📩🔸Answer:

It doesn’t invalidate it and Allah knows best unless they purposely intended that.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7610

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

▪️Accepting the invitation of the Waleemah of the wife's family▪️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him-.

📩🔹Question:

A person married their daughter to someone and they called some brothers to the Waleemah which they made in their house.

Is it a must to accept the invitation and to go there, or is it specific to the Waleemah by the man?

📤🔸Answer:

The Waleemah which is obligatory to be accepted is it the Waleemah of the man, not the woman.

Shaykh Utheymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "The Waleemah if it was by the husband then accepting it is obligatory.

Similarly if it was a join Waleemah between the husband and the wife's family, accepting it is obligatory.

Because the husband is requested to the Waleemah, due to the statement of the Prophet ﷺ to Abdurrahman bin Auwf: "Perform a Waleemah even if it was with a sheep/goat".

And if the Waleemah was only by the wife's family then it's not obligatory to accept, accepting it is only Sunnah".

____
Translated by:
Abu Ibraheem 'Abdullaah bin Ahmed Ash-Shingaani

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/254

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️(x10) Lā ilāha illallāhu waḥdahu lā sharīka lah…(Is it from the post Fajr and Maghrib remembrance)?◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

Is it from the after Fajr and Maghrib remembrances to say the (following) statement 10 times?

(لا إله إلا الله وحده لاشريك له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شيء قدير)
“None has the right to be worshipped but Allah alone, Who has no partner. His is the dominion and His is the praise and He is Able to do all things”.

📩🔸Answer:

What’s correct is that it’s from the morning and evening remembrances, and it’s not from the remembrances of Fajr and Maghrib.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7621

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️The death of the recent Iranian president◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

What’s your advise to the Muslims concerning the stance required to be taken after the death of the president of Iran, the heretic, disbeliever, when they are seeing their rulers publicly condoling his passing away and are openly seeking mercy from Allah over the victims of the helicopter crash?

📩🔸Answer:

The advice and position required is for the Muslims to be upright upon the Book of their Lord and Sunnah of their Prophet ﷺ; and to return (with a proper return) to the Manhaj of their Salaf - may Allah be pleased with them - then they will prosper with all goodness for their nations and their rulers.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/7614

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️”The curse of Allah be upon the Houthies”◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

“The curse of Allah be upon the Houthies”. Is this permissible (to say)?

📩🔸Answer:

Yes it’s permissible, and it is a (general) curse over the description and it’s not a curse to a particular (person). Moreover, they deserve to be cursed because they are Rāfidah, and the Rāfidah are heretics, cursed.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/6267

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Announcements/advertisements made in the Masajid of funerals, marriages and other affairs◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

We have Masājid in our town that make announcements of funerals, infact they even make announcements of marriages, and announcements of opening up schools, tribal meetings and affairs relating to it. Note that we all live in one village and we all are of one tribe.

📩🔸Answer:

The announcements of funerals is fine from the angle of directing people to worship and goodness. As for the rest sort of announcements, then it’s an expansion not pleased upon, it’s incumbent to leave that off, and Allah the Most High knows best.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/6267

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Seeking to know the gender of the fetus◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

Is it permissible to find out the gender of the fetus if it’s a boy or girl?

📩🔸Answer:

No prevention and Allah knows best.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/6267

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Being in a state of sexual impurity, making ghusl, then after some time more semen comes out◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

If a person was in a state of major sexual impurity and they make Ghusl, then after the Ghusl is made whether it was a long or short period, semen comes out from him again.

Should they make Ghusl again?

📩🔸Answer:

The Fuqaha differed in this topic, and what’s more correct is that it’s not upon him to make Ghusl again; because it’s (from) one sexual impurity, and this sperm that exits from him is only from the first waters which remained in the male organ and came out after the Ghusl.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/6267

بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم

◾️Safeguarding the sanctity of the Masjid if a person wanted to walk when waiting for prayer◾️

Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him -

📩🔹Question:

We see some people exercising by walking inside the Masjid. You see them walking perhaps for around 30 minutes saying “I’m in the Masjid waiting for the prayer or sunrise and I use that period to exercise by walking to burn fat and so forth”.

📩🔸Answer:

And if they were to remember Allah alongside that and walk in a manner befitting to the sanctity of the Masjid, then there’s no issue and Allah knows best.

____
Translated by:
Abu Mālik Nāsir bin Rāshid Al-Ma’mary

Telegram link to the channel:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaiben

Original Fatwa:
www.tg-me.com/Bashuaib/6267