From Twitter :
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber There are countless private chains based on EOSIO that will not be migrating to Antelope. Whether or not it is dead is not material to the fact that EOSIO is still a thing owned by someone else that was not "rebranded" any more than "AMD" rebranded "Intel".
🔗 Context 🔗
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber There are countless private chains based on EOSIO that will not be migrating to Antelope. Whether or not it is dead is not material to the fact that EOSIO is still a thing owned by someone else that was not "rebranded" any more than "AMD" rebranded "Intel".
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@DavBezos @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Nope. It will use an enhanced version of EOSVM though. That is where the similarity will end.
🔗 Context 🔗
@DavBezos @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Nope. It will use an enhanced version of EOSVM though. That is where the similarity will end.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Whether or not that is true is not material to whether antelope is a fork or rebrand.
🔗 Context 🔗
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Whether or not that is true is not material to whether antelope is a fork or rebrand.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@brandonlovejoy @HernanArber somibody swappid thi e and i kiys on my kiyboard.
🔗 Context 🔗
@brandonlovejoy @HernanArber somibody swappid thi e and i kiys on my kiyboard.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber It is awe-inspiring to watch the community come together and launch Antelope from the decaying body of EOSIO. Great to see that so many people see so much value in the underlying tech.
🔗 Context 🔗
@IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber It is awe-inspiring to watch the community come together and launch Antelope from the decaying body of EOSIO. Great to see that so many people see so much value in the underlying tech.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@HernanArber @IgnoreRonPaul @WAX_io @HelloTelos @Network_UX @AntelopeIO @bywirenews @BigBeardSamurai @VitalikButerin @brockpierce @Barnzooor @jessethan3 @EosNFoundation @BlockchainZack @opensource_orgs Is the logo explained anywhere?
🔗 Context 🔗
@HernanArber @IgnoreRonPaul @WAX_io @HelloTelos @Network_UX @AntelopeIO @bywirenews @BigBeardSamurai @VitalikButerin @brockpierce @Barnzooor @jessethan3 @EosNFoundation @BlockchainZack @opensource_orgs Is the logo explained anywhere?
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@VitalikButerin @ChrisLundkvist This only makes sense if you ignore the safety risks and climate differences. Not everyone enjoys a California climate. This kind of thinking is a “let them eat cake” kinda moment.
🔗 Context 🔗
@VitalikButerin @ChrisLundkvist This only makes sense if you ignore the safety risks and climate differences. Not everyone enjoys a California climate. This kind of thinking is a “let them eat cake” kinda moment.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Well one thing is certain bullish will keep using eosio. But it is all moot anyway, the upcoming chain codebase by fractally will redefine expectations from a developer perspective. We will find out just how fast this antelope is when it comes to upgrades. friendly competition.
🔗 Context 🔗
@infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Well one thing is certain bullish will keep using eosio. But it is all moot anyway, the upcoming chain codebase by fractally will redefine expectations from a developer perspective. We will find out just how fast this antelope is when it comes to upgrades. friendly competition.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
We just released the latest preview of the new fractally interface for reaching consensus on ranking things in small groups. @gofractally This interface will be available for testing by the https://t.co/WGvLrwQgjY community this week. https://t.co/nbFEtPrkH8
🔗 Context 🔗
We just released the latest preview of the new fractally interface for reaching consensus on ranking things in small groups. @gofractally This interface will be available for testing by the https://t.co/WGvLrwQgjY community this week. https://t.co/nbFEtPrkH8
🔗 Context 🔗
and you have lost focus when you ignore the off-chain consensus represented by antelope and ENF or even the fact that EOS is utilizing DPOS which is a poor algorithm for measuring the consensus of a group of users.
🔗 Context 🔗
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@Tavareos1 @infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber It could with a lot of effort. Imagine integrating eos improvements into #eth
🔗 Context 🔗
@Tavareos1 @infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber It could with a lot of effort. Imagine integrating eos improvements into #eth
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@Wu2318288670 @infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Bullish is one of the biggest exchanges by volume. It’s just serving institutional users and market makers, not retail.
🔗 Context 🔗
@Wu2318288670 @infinitybloc @IgnoreRonPaul @HernanArber Bullish is one of the biggest exchanges by volume. It’s just serving institutional users and market makers, not retail.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@IgnoreRonPaul @Tavareos1 @infinitybloc @HernanArber It will take eos years to add the kind of features we are working on. Plus, I want a non plutocratic governance system.
🔗 Context 🔗
@IgnoreRonPaul @Tavareos1 @infinitybloc @HernanArber It will take eos years to add the kind of features we are working on. Plus, I want a non plutocratic governance system.
🔗 Context 🔗
The problem isn’t voter apathy it is Pareto distribution plus exchanges voting with user tokens amplifying things. DPOS is a good technical solution but bad social solution. Yes, I can critique my past work, it is only way to advance.
Replying to:
> For a public blockchain there is a disconnect between the bps and the community per say because most users are not taking part in voting for bps...when voting participation is weak then the system becomes weak and fails to be more transparent...I think DPOS protocol tends to be better suited for centralized chains like WAX but if voting was a popular thing DPOS would be great for public chains 😁
🔗 Context 🔗
Replying to:
> For a public blockchain there is a disconnect between the bps and the community per say because most users are not taking part in voting for bps...when voting participation is weak then the system becomes weak and fails to be more transparent...I think DPOS protocol tends to be better suited for centralized chains like WAX but if voting was a popular thing DPOS would be great for public chains 😁
🔗 Context 🔗
With Fractally we are supporting EOS, Hive, and Bitshares fractals and recognizing contributions to all these communities
🔗 Context 🔗
🔗 Context 🔗