Telegram Web Link
Natural Theology
1949_A_Cotter_ABC_of_Scholastic_Philosophy_600dpi,_BW,_OCR.pdf
"Some 30 years of teaching philosophy and theology have convinced me of its pedagogical worth. There is no other philosophical system that can rival the scholastic in common sense and definiteness. There is no other philosophical method that even approaches the scholastic in sound reasoning and logical force."
❀1
😁9
Don't blame God, kid. Read Proverbs first
😁8
😁14πŸ€”1
Forwarded from Diet of Worms
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Weakest Confessional Lutheran
πŸ”₯10❀1
Forwarded from Fundamental Christianity
We already knew that.
πŸ₯°1
Forwarded from Fundamental Christianity
πŸ‘5
This media is not supported in the widget
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❀9πŸ€·β€β™‚2πŸ‘1
Forwarded from Arthur
Bernard Wuellner - Summary of Scholastic Principles - 2011.pdf
8.7 MB
Bernard Wuellner, S.J. - Summary of Scholastic Principles (2011) #scholasticism
❀1
Forwarded from Arthur
Bernard_Wuellner,_S_J_Dictionary_of_Scholastic_Philosophy_1966.pdf
26.3 MB
Bernard Wuellner, S.J. - Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy (1966) #scholasticism
❀1
Thomford,L..pdf
210.9 KB
C.S. Lewis: His Views on Scripture, Mythology, and Their Application to the Book of Esther


[Abstract]
This paper seeks to analyze C.S. Lewis's beliefs about the inspiration of certain parts of Scripture, particularly Esther and the Old Testament. Lewis thought it likely that the book of Esther was work of fiction. In this paper, Lewis's comments on his beliefs about the nature of verbal inspiration are summarized along with some of his beliefs about the nature and function of mythology. Then, features of the book of Esther are analyzed as a test case for why Lewis may have doubted the historicity of this book. This is done to show that Lewis was consistent in his belief that certain parts of the Old Testament did not need to be considered historical to be canonical or inspired.
πŸ‘5πŸ₯°3❀1
🀣6
2025/10/21 10:37:16
Back to Top
HTML Embed Code: