Should I do a X space tomorrow exposing Steve Sailer?
π2.04Kπ₯148β€77π60π28
Forwarded from The_God_Emperor
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π1.73Kπ₯79β€64π35π28
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the MASSACRE IN RAFAH
Cozy.tv/nick
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
Cozy.tv/nick
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
Cozy.tv
Nick on Cozy.tv
Host of America First with Nicholas J Fuentes Send superchats using Entropy: https://entropystream.live/nickjfuentes PO Box: 156 Western Springs, IL 60558
π₯714β€56π36π13π5
After a week of controversy surrounding my attacks on Steve Sailer for being a subversive crypto-Jew and Jewish chauvinist, Sailer has published a new article doubling down on his belief that Christians. and not Jews, are responsible for "wokeism," and takes it further saying that Jews actually haven't had very much influence on American society at all.
https://x.com/steve_sailer/status/1795712002683461834
https://x.com/steve_sailer/status/1795712002683461834
X (formerly Twitter)
Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) on X
My new Taki's column: "In This House We Believe: The Protestant Roots of Wokeness:"
https://t.co/KnaB3m3lFD
https://t.co/KnaB3m3lFD
π1.46Kπ61β€38π₯26π12
Notably, Sailer also writes that DEI threatens Jewish overrepresentation at elite American institutions, which confirms what I have long suspected about the latest "anti-DEI" push by the Right.
π1.22Kπ156π₯68β€23π10
This BAP network insists that Christians are responsible for immigration, Christians are responsible for Wokeism, Christians are responsible for Zionism... notice a pattern?
π1.43Kπ₯121π91β€25π13
In this article, Steve Sailer argues that the influence of Jews in America is overstated because Jews are *only* overrepresented by 300% on Time Magazine's 2006 list of the 100 most influential Americans.
Jew comprise 7% of the names on the list, even though Jews comprise just 2% of the overall population and only arrived in America in large numbers in the last 100 years, while the list spans the entire history of the United States.
This is hardly a serious, rigorous, systematic, or even adequate warrant for this claim.
Last week, Sailer argued that American blacks' European admixture could only account for a 3 point IQ difference between them and black Africans. His evidence for this is that since the IQ gap between those populations is 15 and American blacks have on average 18% European admixture, then that admixture could only account for a 3 point difference because 15 * 0.18 = ~3.
Obviously IQ and DNA do not have a linear relationship like this. If I am 25% Mexican, could I calculate my height by multiplying the average height of Mexicans by 0.25 and subtract it from other ethnic averages? This makes no sense on its face.
From what I've seen, Sailer is simply not a serious intellectual, in addition to being a Jewish chauvinist.
Jew comprise 7% of the names on the list, even though Jews comprise just 2% of the overall population and only arrived in America in large numbers in the last 100 years, while the list spans the entire history of the United States.
This is hardly a serious, rigorous, systematic, or even adequate warrant for this claim.
Last week, Sailer argued that American blacks' European admixture could only account for a 3 point IQ difference between them and black Africans. His evidence for this is that since the IQ gap between those populations is 15 and American blacks have on average 18% European admixture, then that admixture could only account for a 3 point difference because 15 * 0.18 = ~3.
Obviously IQ and DNA do not have a linear relationship like this. If I am 25% Mexican, could I calculate my height by multiplying the average height of Mexicans by 0.25 and subtract it from other ethnic averages? This makes no sense on its face.
From what I've seen, Sailer is simply not a serious intellectual, in addition to being a Jewish chauvinist.
π1.47Kπ261π₯127β€51π22
America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing TRUMP and his IMMINENT INDICTMENT... or ACQUITTAL???
Cozy.tv/nick
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
Cozy.tv/nick
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes
Cozy.tv
Nick on Cozy.tv
Host of America First with Nicholas J Fuentes Send superchats using Entropy: https://entropystream.live/nickjfuentes PO Box: 156 Western Springs, IL 60558
π632π₯89β€33π26π13
How is BAP going to accuse me of working with DailyWire when Shapiro openly said he is reading BAPβs book and Klavan is interviewing the Dark Elf Yarvin?
π1.5Kπ₯82π42β€27π7
Nicholas J. Fuentes
The new strategy is to create βliberal-critical alternativesβ to Nick Fuentes that donβt talk about Jews/Zionism. Sounds a lot like BAP, which they praised recently. Or other similar offerings such as NatCon.
This is Andrew Klavanβs son last year arguing that conservatives must offer a βliberalism-critical alternativeβ that doesnβt βveer offβ into antisemitism.
Is that what Yarvin is supposed to be?
Is that what Yarvin is supposed to be?
β€1.03Kπ155π124π₯33π9
Spencer Klavan is the Associate Editor of Claremont Review of Books and was the editor of the BAP compendium issue in summer 2019.
He is also gay-married to the legal counsel of DailyWire, Joshua Herr.
Are you starting to get it?
He is also gay-married to the legal counsel of DailyWire, Joshua Herr.
Are you starting to get it?
β€1.04Kπ248π₯114π83π14
Senior NSC staffer and West Coast Straussian Michael Anton is introduced to BAP book by Curtis Yarvin and fellow Trump admin staffer Darren Beattie.
Anton presumably worked with Joshua Steinman and Mike Benz for natsec in the Trump admin.
Andrew Klavanβs son, Spencer Klavan edited issue XIX of Claremont Review of Books in which Michael Anton reviews BAP Book.
Klavan writes his own essay about BAP in the Claremont publication American Mind.
In 2023, Spencer Klavan claims that the only way to wrest energy away from groypers and steer the Right away from βantisemitic Reactionaryβ politics is to offer a liberal-critical alternative on his fatherβs DailyWire podcast.
Later in 2023, Ben Shapiro says he is currently reading Costin Alamariuβs (BAP) PhD thesis βSelective Breeding.β
In 2024, Andrew Klavan interviews Curtis Yarvin.
Anton presumably worked with Joshua Steinman and Mike Benz for natsec in the Trump admin.
Andrew Klavanβs son, Spencer Klavan edited issue XIX of Claremont Review of Books in which Michael Anton reviews BAP Book.
Klavan writes his own essay about BAP in the Claremont publication American Mind.
In 2023, Spencer Klavan claims that the only way to wrest energy away from groypers and steer the Right away from βantisemitic Reactionaryβ politics is to offer a liberal-critical alternative on his fatherβs DailyWire podcast.
Later in 2023, Ben Shapiro says he is currently reading Costin Alamariuβs (BAP) PhD thesis βSelective Breeding.β
In 2024, Andrew Klavan interviews Curtis Yarvin.
π₯1.02Kβ€58π52π27π9
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is how West Coast-Straussian and Claremont editor Michael Anton came to discover BAP book.
Curtis Yarvin and Darren Beattie pressed him to review it for Claremont.
Anton was placed in the Trump admin by Peter Thiel.
Curtis Yarvin and Darren Beattie pressed him to review it for Claremont.
Anton was placed in the Trump admin by Peter Thiel.
π₯1.1Kπ64β€44π31π12