14.06.2025
📊Task 1: The two line graphs below shows the cinema attendance in Australia and the amount of money spent on cinema tickets from 1980 to 2015.
@otaboyevblog
📊Task 1: The two line graphs below shows the cinema attendance in Australia and the amount of money spent on cinema tickets from 1980 to 2015.
@otaboyevblog
❤6⚡2
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
14.06.2025 📊Task 1: The two line graphs below shows the cinema attendance in Australia and the amount of money spent on cinema tickets from 1980 to 2015. @otaboyevblog
📈Task 1: Graphs with a trend (Line Graph) - June 14, 2025
The line charts illustrate the trends in cinema attendance and expenditure on cinema tickets in Australia over a 35-year period, from 1980 to 2015.
Overall, both cinema attendance and ticket spending showed a significant increase over the period, despite minor fluctuations.
In terms of cinema attendance, just under 35% of the population visited the cinema in 1980, a figure that rose noticeably to slightly over 50% by 2000. This was followed by a period of fluctuation around 60% between 2000 and 2010, before peaking at approximately 72% in 2015 — more than double the 1980 level.
With regard to cinema spending, the average amount paid per person began at around $200 AUD in 1980. This amount doubled to $400 by 1990, after which spending remained largely unchanged until the mid 2000s. From 2007 onwards, ticket spending increased sharply, reaching a high of roughly $1200 in 2015 — six times higher than in 1980.
Report 39
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
The line charts illustrate the trends in cinema attendance and expenditure on cinema tickets in Australia over a 35-year period, from 1980 to 2015.
Overall, both cinema attendance and ticket spending showed a significant increase over the period, despite minor fluctuations.
In terms of cinema attendance, just under 35% of the population visited the cinema in 1980, a figure that rose noticeably to slightly over 50% by 2000. This was followed by a period of fluctuation around 60% between 2000 and 2010, before peaking at approximately 72% in 2015 — more than double the 1980 level.
With regard to cinema spending, the average amount paid per person began at around $200 AUD in 1980. This amount doubled to $400 by 1990, after which spending remained largely unchanged until the mid 2000s. From 2007 onwards, ticket spending increased sharply, reaching a high of roughly $1200 in 2015 — six times higher than in 1980.
Report 39
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
⚡11❤2🔥1
Too little data can cause just as much stress as too much.
💯20❤5🔥2
Forwarded from Ibragimovic | IELTS
ULTIMATE WRITING SUGGESTION
Let’s be honest: many learners feel lost when it comes to improving their writing. There are tons of suggestions out there. Some say, “Write more.” Others recommend reading books by Pauline Cullen, Simon, or other IELTS experts.
But before you dive into any method, you must first understand one thing: What is IELTS writing? What does it actually expect from you?
Once you clearly grasp the requirements and scoring criteria, here’s the strategy that worked for me, and I genuinely believe it can work for you too: Read. A lot.
Yes, the key to better writing is more reading. That’s how I personally improved, not by blindly writing essays every day, but by soaking in the language through consistent, smart reading.
Why does this work? Because when you read regularly, you naturally absorb:
👀 Advanced sentence structures
👀 Accurate grammar usage
👀 High-level collocations
👀 Topic-specific vocabulary
👀 Tone and coherence
Reading does for your writing what listening does for your speaking.
When you listen, you pick up natural phrases and structures to use once you speak.
It’s the same with writing, the more quality content you read, the more your brain learns what “good writing” looks like.
So here’s the mindset shift I want you to have:
Read like a writer. Write like a reader.
This means you don’t just read for fun, you read to absorb style, structure, and vocabulary.
And you don’t just write to express, you write to connect and make sense to others.
🛸 Input = Output.
If you don’t read, you won’t have the necessary input. And without input, how can you expect to produce quality output?
Now, when I say "read more," I don't mean forcing yourself to read boring academic texts all the time. Read what excites you. Whether it’s:
✨ News about the latest global events
✨ An article about your favorite footballer
✨ A book on psychology or business
✨ A blog post on fashion trends
As long as it’s well-written, you’re learning.
Personally, I read something every day. After El Clasico, I read post-match analysis.
When I got curious about Social Media Marketing or economics, I searched, explored, and read articles on those topics. That’s how I feed my brain.
The internet is packed with content. All you need to do is take action. Open Google, YouTube, or even ChatGPT, and start reading.
Growth takes time. Your writing won’t change overnight. But trust me, with consistent reading, your brain will connect the dots.
You’ll find yourself writing better, clearer, and more naturally, not just for IELTS, but for life.
Let's go. Don't wait for the perfect method. Pick up something to read.
And let that be the first step towards your mastery.
I said what I said.
#IELTSwriting #Suggestion
Let’s be honest: many learners feel lost when it comes to improving their writing. There are tons of suggestions out there. Some say, “Write more.” Others recommend reading books by Pauline Cullen, Simon, or other IELTS experts.
But before you dive into any method, you must first understand one thing: What is IELTS writing? What does it actually expect from you?
Once you clearly grasp the requirements and scoring criteria, here’s the strategy that worked for me, and I genuinely believe it can work for you too: Read. A lot.
Yes, the key to better writing is more reading. That’s how I personally improved, not by blindly writing essays every day, but by soaking in the language through consistent, smart reading.
Why does this work? Because when you read regularly, you naturally absorb:
Reading does for your writing what listening does for your speaking.
When you listen, you pick up natural phrases and structures to use once you speak.
It’s the same with writing, the more quality content you read, the more your brain learns what “good writing” looks like.
So here’s the mindset shift I want you to have:
Read like a writer. Write like a reader.
This means you don’t just read for fun, you read to absorb style, structure, and vocabulary.
And you don’t just write to express, you write to connect and make sense to others.
If you don’t read, you won’t have the necessary input. And without input, how can you expect to produce quality output?
Now, when I say "read more," I don't mean forcing yourself to read boring academic texts all the time. Read what excites you. Whether it’s:
As long as it’s well-written, you’re learning.
Personally, I read something every day. After El Clasico, I read post-match analysis.
When I got curious about Social Media Marketing or economics, I searched, explored, and read articles on those topics. That’s how I feed my brain.
The internet is packed with content. All you need to do is take action. Open Google, YouTube, or even ChatGPT, and start reading.
Growth takes time. Your writing won’t change overnight. But trust me, with consistent reading, your brain will connect the dots.
You’ll find yourself writing better, clearer, and more naturally, not just for IELTS, but for life.
Let's go. Don't wait for the perfect method. Pick up something to read.
And let that be the first step towards your mastery.
I said what I said.
#IELTSwriting #Suggestion
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯11❤2⚡1🐳1
19.06.2025
📊Task 1: The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005.
@otaboyevblog
📊Task 1: The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005.
@otaboyevblog
⚡7🔥2💯1
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
19.06.2025 📊Task 1: The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005. @otaboyevblog
📈Task 1: Graphs with a trend (Line Graph) - June 19, 2025
The line graph shows the number of incidents of car theft, house burglary, and street robbery in England and Wales between 1970 and 2005.
Overall, car theft was consistently the most common type of crime over the period, while street robbery remained the least frequent. Although car theft and house burglary showed variations over the years, street robbery experienced a slight increase.
In terms of car theft, around 0.4 million incidents were recorded in 1970, a figure that more than doubled to reach 1 million by 1985. The number then rose sharply over the following five years, reaching a peak of 1.6 million, before dropping to 1 million by 2005. House burglaries followed a somewhat similar pattern, increasing from 0.2 million in 1970 to 0.6 million by 1980. It stayed stable until 1985, then rose slightly to about 0.7 million before declining to 0.5 million by 2005 — exactly half the figure for car theft.
Street robbery, by contrast, remained low throughout the period, starting at under 0.1 million in 1970. It rose gradually to around 0.2 million by 2000 and continued at that level until 2005.
Report 40
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
The line graph shows the number of incidents of car theft, house burglary, and street robbery in England and Wales between 1970 and 2005.
Overall, car theft was consistently the most common type of crime over the period, while street robbery remained the least frequent. Although car theft and house burglary showed variations over the years, street robbery experienced a slight increase.
In terms of car theft, around 0.4 million incidents were recorded in 1970, a figure that more than doubled to reach 1 million by 1985. The number then rose sharply over the following five years, reaching a peak of 1.6 million, before dropping to 1 million by 2005. House burglaries followed a somewhat similar pattern, increasing from 0.2 million in 1970 to 0.6 million by 1980. It stayed stable until 1985, then rose slightly to about 0.7 million before declining to 0.5 million by 2005 — exactly half the figure for car theft.
Street robbery, by contrast, remained low throughout the period, starting at under 0.1 million in 1970. It rose gradually to around 0.2 million by 2000 and continued at that level until 2005.
Report 40
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
🔥12❤2⚡1
JUNE 7, 2025
📊 TASK 1: The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015.
@otaboyevblog
📊 TASK 1: The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015.
@otaboyevblog
🔥5❤1⚡1
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
JUNE 7, 2025 📊 TASK 1: The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015. @otaboyevblog
📈Task 1: Comparative Graphs (Bar Graph) - June 7, 2025
The bar chart compares the average number of hours per day that individuals aged 15 and 19 and those aged 75 and over spent on leisure and recreational activities in the US in 2015.
Overall, watching TV was by far the most popular activity among both age groups. In addition, older people tended to prefer sedentary activities such as watching TV, reading, and relaxing and thinking, whereas younger people spent more time on physical activities.
Young people spent most of their time watching TV, with just under 2.5 hours daily. This was followed by playing games and using the computer for leisure at slightly over an hour per day. Socializing/communication and sports/exercise/recreation ranked next with around 0.7 hours and 0.6 hours, respectively. Reading and relaxing/thinking took up the least amount of time, with less than 15 minutes each.
People aged 75 and over spent 4.5 hours watching TV — far more than their younger counterparts. The second most popular activity was reading, with an average of 1 hour per day. They spent just over 30 minutes relaxing and thinking, and 40 minutes socializing and communicating. Playing games and using the computer for leisure followed, taking up just 30 minutes — precisely half the time reported by younger people. The least common activity among older adults was sport, exercise and recreation, with fewer than 15 minutes allocated to it per day.
Report 41
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
The bar chart compares the average number of hours per day that individuals aged 15 and 19 and those aged 75 and over spent on leisure and recreational activities in the US in 2015.
Overall, watching TV was by far the most popular activity among both age groups. In addition, older people tended to prefer sedentary activities such as watching TV, reading, and relaxing and thinking, whereas younger people spent more time on physical activities.
Young people spent most of their time watching TV, with just under 2.5 hours daily. This was followed by playing games and using the computer for leisure at slightly over an hour per day. Socializing/communication and sports/exercise/recreation ranked next with around 0.7 hours and 0.6 hours, respectively. Reading and relaxing/thinking took up the least amount of time, with less than 15 minutes each.
People aged 75 and over spent 4.5 hours watching TV — far more than their younger counterparts. The second most popular activity was reading, with an average of 1 hour per day. They spent just over 30 minutes relaxing and thinking, and 40 minutes socializing and communicating. Playing games and using the computer for leisure followed, taking up just 30 minutes — precisely half the time reported by younger people. The least common activity among older adults was sport, exercise and recreation, with fewer than 15 minutes allocated to it per day.
Report 41
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
❤12🔥5⚡3
O’zbekistonda online o’qisa bo’ladigan Universitetlar bormi?
❤22💔13💯3
21.06.2025
📊Task 1: The graph below shows the percentage of people who accessed news in the USA between 2012 and 2015.
@otaboyevblog
📊Task 1: The graph below shows the percentage of people who accessed news in the USA between 2012 and 2015.
@otaboyevblog
❤9⚡5🔥2
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
21.06.2025 📊Task 1: The graph below shows the percentage of people who accessed news in the USA between 2012 and 2015. @otaboyevblog
📈Task 1: Graphs with a trend (Line Graph) - June 21, 2025
The line graph compares the proportion of people who accessed news through four different sources — websites, TV, print, and social media — in the USA from 2012 to 2015.
Overall, the use of social media for accessing news increased steadily over the period, while reliance on printed news declined sharply. In contrast, website and TV usage remained relatively stable, with websites consistently being the most common source of news throughout the period.
In 2012, TV and websites were dominant platforms for news access, with approximately 78% and 79% of users, respectively. TV usage rose marginally to 80% in 2013 and continued at this level until 2015. In comparison, website usage peaked at 79% in 2013 before declining slightly to about 75% by 2015, widening the gap between the two sources.
By contrast, only 20% of people consumed news via social media in 2012 — roughly half the proportion for printed news, which stood at just under 40%. The percentage of individuals who relied on social media for news increased gradually, doubling to 40% by 2015. Meanwhile, printed news saw a brief rise to 50% in 2013, before plummeting to 25% by the end of the period.
Report 42
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
The line graph compares the proportion of people who accessed news through four different sources — websites, TV, print, and social media — in the USA from 2012 to 2015.
Overall, the use of social media for accessing news increased steadily over the period, while reliance on printed news declined sharply. In contrast, website and TV usage remained relatively stable, with websites consistently being the most common source of news throughout the period.
In 2012, TV and websites were dominant platforms for news access, with approximately 78% and 79% of users, respectively. TV usage rose marginally to 80% in 2013 and continued at this level until 2015. In comparison, website usage peaked at 79% in 2013 before declining slightly to about 75% by 2015, widening the gap between the two sources.
By contrast, only 20% of people consumed news via social media in 2012 — roughly half the proportion for printed news, which stood at just under 40%. The percentage of individuals who relied on social media for news increased gradually, doubling to 40% by 2015. Meanwhile, printed news saw a brief rise to 50% in 2013, before plummeting to 25% by the end of the period.
Report 42
#Task_1
@otaboyevblog
⚡10❤9
Mas’uliyat
Turmush qurush — bu mas’uliyat.
Farzand ko’rish esa, undanda ko’proq mas’uliyat berar ekan.
Endi siz o’zingizni har bir hatti-harakatingizni kuzatishni boshlaysiz.
Yomon odatlaringizdan voz kechishga majbursiz, chunki bola eshitganini emas, ko’rganini qiladi.
Masalan, telefonni har doimgidan kamroq ishlatyapman.
Zararli narsalar yeyishni ancha oldin hayotimizdan chiqarib tashlaganmiz.
Muhammad Ali tug’ilganiga 9 kun bo’ldi. Men esa shu 9 kundan buyon o’zimni har kuni tahlil qilyapman.
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda unchalik ko’rinmayapman. Hozircha shunisi ma’qul.
Hozir asosan 3ta muhim narsaga fokus qaratyapman: Family, Work, CELTA.
#thoughts
@otaboyevblog
Turmush qurush — bu mas’uliyat.
Farzand ko’rish esa, undanda ko’proq mas’uliyat berar ekan.
Endi siz o’zingizni har bir hatti-harakatingizni kuzatishni boshlaysiz.
Yomon odatlaringizdan voz kechishga majbursiz, chunki bola eshitganini emas, ko’rganini qiladi.
Masalan, telefonni har doimgidan kamroq ishlatyapman.
Zararli narsalar yeyishni ancha oldin hayotimizdan chiqarib tashlaganmiz.
Muhammad Ali tug’ilganiga 9 kun bo’ldi. Men esa shu 9 kundan buyon o’zimni har kuni tahlil qilyapman.
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda unchalik ko’rinmayapman. Hozircha shunisi ma’qul.
Hozir asosan 3ta muhim narsaga fokus qaratyapman: Family, Work, CELTA.
#thoughts
@otaboyevblog
1❤88🔥19⚡10🐳2💯1
“CELTA”dan olgan muhim insightlarim:
• O’qituvchi kam gapirsin, o’quvchi esa ko’proq.
• Tushunmaydigan o’quvchi bo’lmaydi, tushuntirolmaydigan o’qituvchi bo’ladi.
• 45 minutlik dars uchun, 2-3 soat tayyorgarlik ko’riladi.
• Boshida osondek tuyuladi, lekin kundan-kunga qiyinlashib ketaveradi.
• Yozadigan va to’ldiradigan narsalar ko’p. Ba’zida chalkashib ketasiz.
#reflections
@otaboyevblog
• O’qituvchi kam gapirsin, o’quvchi esa ko’proq.
• Tushunmaydigan o’quvchi bo’lmaydi, tushuntirolmaydigan o’qituvchi bo’ladi.
• 45 minutlik dars uchun, 2-3 soat tayyorgarlik ko’riladi.
• Boshida osondek tuyuladi, lekin kundan-kunga qiyinlashib ketaveradi.
• Yozadigan va to’ldiradigan narsalar ko’p. Ba’zida chalkashib ketasiz.
#reflections
@otaboyevblog
❤62🔥11⚡7🐳2
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
“CELTA”dan olgan muhim insightlarim: • O’qituvchi kam gapirsin, o’quvchi esa ko’proq. • Tushunmaydigan o’quvchi bo’lmaydi, tushuntirolmaydigan o’qituvchi bo’ladi. • 45 minutlik dars uchun, 2-3 soat tayyorgarlik ko’riladi. • Boshida osondek tuyuladi, lekin…
+ uyquni ham unutishingiz kerak!
⚡19🤯12💔5❤3