Media is too big
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    This media is not supported in your browser
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    This media is not supported in your browser
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    This media is not supported in your browser
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    This media is not supported in your browser
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    This media is not supported in your browser
      VIEW IN TELEGRAM
    EBT 2
❤6😁2❤🔥1🔥1🤣1
  This media is not supported in your browser
    VIEW IN TELEGRAM
  🚨 BREAKING: New Jersey governor candidate Jack Ciattarelli (R) expected to win 60% of the election day vote, trouncing Mikie Sherrill (D) by 21 points.
Jack is expected to win the early-in person vote by ONE point, 49%-48%.
Sherrill is expected to win mail-in voting by 57 points, 76%-19%, per
Jack is expected to win the early-in person vote by ONE point, 49%-48%.
Sherrill is expected to win mail-in voting by 57 points, 76%-19%, per
❤17👍8👎1🥱1
  If certain folks would listen to a few Veterans with Special Operations, especially one with a #1 Best Selling Book, the ONLY ironclad blueprint of 45——47, this wouldn’t be such a shock 🤭
Instead, many of those same people cannot tell the difference in two clearly different people. 📌
All pre-planned.
All strategic.
All Unconventional Warfare.
All Irregular Warfare.
All in current Laws and Orders invoked.
99% of Military Operations to date are from Orders from 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020.
👉🏻 ———
👉🏻 45———47 🫡♠️🇺🇸
Instead, many of those same people cannot tell the difference in two clearly different people. 📌
All pre-planned.
All strategic.
All Unconventional Warfare.
All Irregular Warfare.
All in current Laws and Orders invoked.
99% of Military Operations to date are from Orders from 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020.
👉🏻 ———
👉🏻 45———47 🫡♠️🇺🇸
❤19🔥6
  This media is not supported in your browser
    VIEW IN TELEGRAM
  RFK Jr: "The polio vaccine contained a virus called SV40."
"It's one of the most carcinogenic materials that is known to man."
"But it was in that vaccine. 98 million people... in my generation got it."
"And now you've had this explosion of soft tissue cancers in our generation that kill many, many, many, many, many more people than polio ever did."
"It's one of the most carcinogenic materials that is known to man."
"But it was in that vaccine. 98 million people... in my generation got it."
"And now you've had this explosion of soft tissue cancers in our generation that kill many, many, many, many, many more people than polio ever did."
🔥11👍3
  This media is not supported in your browser
    VIEW IN TELEGRAM
  Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed
In a stunning revelation. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones.
At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease.
If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight.
Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution.
But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire.
Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved.
This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?
In a stunning revelation. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones.
At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease.
If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight.
Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution.
But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire.
Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved.
This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?
🔥10🤬2❤1