Wow!
Thank you, President Trump and Elon Musk.
Thank you, President Trump and Elon Musk.
❤35🔥9
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Listen carefully to this congressman. He admits that they put “working the will of the Congress” before doing the will of the people.
This is a real danger and it’s one that the MAGA movement will purge.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
This is a real danger and it’s one that the MAGA movement will purge.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
🔥45😢1
The collaboration between Elon Musk and President Trump is not just a meeting of minds; it's a fusion of visionary innovation and no-nonsense leadership. Musk, with his unparalleled track record in tech and space, brings a level of expertise and disruption that complements Trump's straightforward approach to governance. Together, they symbolize a powerful force for deregulation, efficiency, and economic prosperity.
This partnership is sending shockwaves through the radical liberal elected class. Their fear stems from the potential this duo has to dismantle the bureaucratic red tape that's been stifling growth. Musk's commitment to free speech and Trump's push for America First policies challenge the progressive narrative, threatening to upend their control over the political discourse. The very thought of Musk's influence in government efficiency, paired with Trump's policy execution, is enough to terrify those who thrive on government expansion and regulation.
It's a new era where the old guard of radical liberalism sees their influence waning, as innovation, freedom, and economic strength take center stage. For those who believe in America's potential, this is nothing short of thrilling.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
This partnership is sending shockwaves through the radical liberal elected class. Their fear stems from the potential this duo has to dismantle the bureaucratic red tape that's been stifling growth. Musk's commitment to free speech and Trump's push for America First policies challenge the progressive narrative, threatening to upend their control over the political discourse. The very thought of Musk's influence in government efficiency, paired with Trump's policy execution, is enough to terrify those who thrive on government expansion and regulation.
It's a new era where the old guard of radical liberalism sees their influence waning, as innovation, freedom, and economic strength take center stage. For those who believe in America's potential, this is nothing short of thrilling.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
🔥28👍5❤4
President Trump's administration is shaping up to be one of the most Catholic-influenced in U.S. history, with the nomination of 12 Catholics to top positions.
This move not only reflects the majority Christian faith in the world, but also signals a commitment to values that resonate deeply with many American voters.
These appointments suggest a policy direction that could prioritize issues like family, life, and religious liberty, aligning with the principles of Catholic social teaching.
It's a clear nod to the significant support Trump received from the Catholic community in the election, indicating a respect for their contributions to the nation's moral and cultural fabric.
This move not only reflects the majority Christian faith in the world, but also signals a commitment to values that resonate deeply with many American voters.
These appointments suggest a policy direction that could prioritize issues like family, life, and religious liberty, aligning with the principles of Catholic social teaching.
It's a clear nod to the significant support Trump received from the Catholic community in the election, indicating a respect for their contributions to the nation's moral and cultural fabric.
❤34👍6🔥1
The recent decision by Republican leadership to appoint Lindsey Graham as a committee chairman is a move that raises eyebrows for all the wrong reasons. Here's why:
1. Inconsistent Stance on Key Issues: Lindsey Graham has been known for his political flip-flopping, particularly his notable shift from being a critic of Donald Trump to one of his most vocal defenders. This inconsistency undermines the stability and credibility needed in a committee leadership role, especially when it comes to setting policy or guiding legislation.
2. Prioritization of Foreign Policy Over Domestic Needs: Graham has a strong focus on foreign affairs and military intervention, which, while important, often overshadows pressing domestic issues like healthcare, education, and economic inequality. With him at the helm of a committee, there's a real risk that domestic priorities might take a backseat to international concerns, which might not align with the immediate needs of American citizens.
3. Controversial Decisions and Statements: As Judiciary Committee Chairman during Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Graham's actions and comments were seen by some as partisan rather than principled. His approach to the committee's work has been criticized for lacking the balance and objectivity expected in such a pivotal role.
4. Ethical Concerns: Graham has faced scrutiny for certain ethical lapses, like soliciting campaign donations in federal buildings, which led to a public admonition by the Senate Ethics Committee. Leadership roles require not just legislative acumen but also a strong ethical compass, which some might argue Graham has shown to be lacking.
5. Voter Disconnect: Many Republicans and independents have expressed frustration with Graham's alignment with the establishment, especially when it comes to his committee roles. His leadership could further alienate voters who are looking for a fresh approach or genuine reform in areas like justice, budget, or appropriations.
In summary, appointing Lindsey Graham to lead any committee isn't just a bad idea—it's a missed opportunity for the GOP to demonstrate a commitment to reform, transparency, and addressing the core issues facing the nation. It's time for Republican leadership to reconsider this choice if they truly want to move beyond the old guard and reconnect with the American electorate on matters that count.
This isn't about party politics; it's about effective, principled governance.
1. Inconsistent Stance on Key Issues: Lindsey Graham has been known for his political flip-flopping, particularly his notable shift from being a critic of Donald Trump to one of his most vocal defenders. This inconsistency undermines the stability and credibility needed in a committee leadership role, especially when it comes to setting policy or guiding legislation.
2. Prioritization of Foreign Policy Over Domestic Needs: Graham has a strong focus on foreign affairs and military intervention, which, while important, often overshadows pressing domestic issues like healthcare, education, and economic inequality. With him at the helm of a committee, there's a real risk that domestic priorities might take a backseat to international concerns, which might not align with the immediate needs of American citizens.
3. Controversial Decisions and Statements: As Judiciary Committee Chairman during Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Graham's actions and comments were seen by some as partisan rather than principled. His approach to the committee's work has been criticized for lacking the balance and objectivity expected in such a pivotal role.
4. Ethical Concerns: Graham has faced scrutiny for certain ethical lapses, like soliciting campaign donations in federal buildings, which led to a public admonition by the Senate Ethics Committee. Leadership roles require not just legislative acumen but also a strong ethical compass, which some might argue Graham has shown to be lacking.
5. Voter Disconnect: Many Republicans and independents have expressed frustration with Graham's alignment with the establishment, especially when it comes to his committee roles. His leadership could further alienate voters who are looking for a fresh approach or genuine reform in areas like justice, budget, or appropriations.
In summary, appointing Lindsey Graham to lead any committee isn't just a bad idea—it's a missed opportunity for the GOP to demonstrate a commitment to reform, transparency, and addressing the core issues facing the nation. It's time for Republican leadership to reconsider this choice if they truly want to move beyond the old guard and reconnect with the American electorate on matters that count.
This isn't about party politics; it's about effective, principled governance.
👍39❤9😢4🔥3
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine takes Jon Husted to Mar-a-Lago as possible JD Vance Senate replacement
- There is significant speculation that Jon Husted might be appointed to replace JD Vance in the U.S. Senate.
- The decision lies with Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, who has the authority to appoint a replacement for Vance's Senate seat until a special election can be held.
- Husted's conservative leanings and his experience in Ohio politics make him a plausible choice for DeWine, who might want to ensure continuity and party loyalty in the Senate.
- His recent visit to Mar-a-Lago indicates he might be seeking or has already received some level of approval from Trump, which could influence DeWine's decision.
- While Husted is favored, Frank LaRose, Dave Yost, and Matt Dolan are also mentioned in various sources as potential replacements. However, Husted's prominence in recent discussions stands out.
- There is significant speculation that Jon Husted might be appointed to replace JD Vance in the U.S. Senate.
- The decision lies with Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, who has the authority to appoint a replacement for Vance's Senate seat until a special election can be held.
- Husted's conservative leanings and his experience in Ohio politics make him a plausible choice for DeWine, who might want to ensure continuity and party loyalty in the Senate.
- His recent visit to Mar-a-Lago indicates he might be seeking or has already received some level of approval from Trump, which could influence DeWine's decision.
- While Husted is favored, Frank LaRose, Dave Yost, and Matt Dolan are also mentioned in various sources as potential replacements. However, Husted's prominence in recent discussions stands out.
👍19❤5🔥2
Good morning!
Those who are accusing or suggesting that President Trump is “threatening to take control of the Panama Canal” are missing the point.
This is called “setting the table” for negotiations. It is not a threat to violently take control, but, rather, a stern warning to begin to treat the U.S. fairly and stop price gouging the fee of American vessels that use the canal.
This statement will likely course-correct the Panamanian government’s extortion-like operating procedures.
President Trump is not going to forcibly take control of the canal.
To suggest such a thing is a demonstration of intellectual immaturity.
This is “Art of The Deal 101,” folks.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
Those who are accusing or suggesting that President Trump is “threatening to take control of the Panama Canal” are missing the point.
This is called “setting the table” for negotiations. It is not a threat to violently take control, but, rather, a stern warning to begin to treat the U.S. fairly and stop price gouging the fee of American vessels that use the canal.
This statement will likely course-correct the Panamanian government’s extortion-like operating procedures.
President Trump is not going to forcibly take control of the canal.
To suggest such a thing is a demonstration of intellectual immaturity.
This is “Art of The Deal 101,” folks.
Believe it.
For the Republic!
Cheers.
👍36❤10🔥2