NATO boss attacks China over Russia ties

Jens Stoltenberg has presented a new justification for the US-led bloc’s pivot to Asia.

Stoltenberg’s comments came during a question-and-answer panel at the NATO Youth Summit, in response to an inquiry from a Yale University student in the US.

“The war in Ukraine demonstrates that security is not regional, security is global,” Stoltenberg said. “The main country that is enabling Russia to conduct its war of aggression against Ukraine in Europe, is China.”

Stoltenberg went on to argue that China is “by far the biggest trading partner” of Russia, supplying Moscow with “critical components” for missiles, drones and other weapons. He also accused Iran of “providing drones” to Russia and North Korea of “providing ammunition and weapons.”

www.tg-me.com/ForeignAgentIntel

Crimea hasn’t been part of “Ukraine” for ten years.

https://www.tg-me.com/ForeignAgentIntel/10621

Tapwater goblin bankers are scared. And that's a good thing.

My favorite bits of Narrative Convergence occur when the enemy's deployments converge with the truth, which, much like water, eventually finds its own level.

Thus, its both a sign of establishment panic and the inevitable forward march of truth when you have WEFian Globalist princes like Yuval Noah Harari accidentally putting together the best possible case for decentralization of the financial sector than any Bitcoin maximalist could hope to achieve.

For starters, this is the rare Globalist Banker rant wherein you can come away in almost total agreement with everything Harari says ... as long as you reject his baseline framing, which is that he and his ilk are net benefits to society.

Harari says the following are threats to the System:

1) Decentralization and transparency.

2) Distrust of government and banking apparatus.

3) Digital Gold.

Simply play the inversion game, and ask yourself if he's wrong on any count.

Recently was on this pod have a listen if you like

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7l0HpQsDRXa92kiuUMgx0l

Trump - "Left wing lunatics are trying to use bird flu to rig the 2024 election"

Man, what’s the Ukraine connection?? What could it be? 🤔

https://www.tg-me.com/GoBPH/1494

Russ Vought

COL Macgregor (Ret) just re-posted this 👀

https://x.com/johnnyfrattofl/status/1790404954764476590?s=46&t=vVc0El_KmRCeSRi0tAT8wQ

It’s called “King” Burning in Hell

These people are insane. Yes, try to convince people of the importance of covid and J6 narrative hoaxes again. That'll work.

"In the end, unless the mood of the electorate about current conditions in the country gets a lot sunnier, Biden’s reelection prospects depend almost entirely on making this a comparative contest in which a plurality of voters firmly reject Trump based on what they know about the 45th president. You don’t have to hate Trump to observe that he actually took his predecessor’s middling economy and did everything within his power to increase inequality, bungled the federal response to COVID-19 and worsened its human and economic impact, and then became the first losing presidential candidate since 1876 to refuse to concede defeat once the states certified his opponent’s victory. But if persuadable voters dismiss all that and think of him as a foulmouthed, erratic politician who nonetheless showered them with prosperity, then he will be hard to beat."

Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/do-americans-remember-the-actual-trump-presidency/ar-BB1mkhiD

The commie at New York Magazine mentioned the contested election of 1876. Let's get the Official Story.

The Regime sure came out of the Civil War as the big winner.

"While the commission was deliberating, Republican allies of Hayes engaged with moderate Southern Democrats in secret negotiations aimed at securing acquiescence to Hayes’s election. Although Bradley leaned toward Tilden’s claim in Florida, he was swayed to back Hayes, and thereafter every action by the Electoral Commission followed a strict 8–7 split in favor of the Republican claims. When the last issue was resolved after 4 AM on March 2, Hayes was declared the winner, with a narrow 185–184 majority, and he was sworn in privately the following day (because March 4 was a Sunday, the public swearing in took place on March 5). Although the result was greeted with outrage and bitterness by some Northern Democrats, who dubbed Hayes “His Fraudulency,” Hayes was sworn in without incident. Southern Democrats, however, found relative contentment with the outcome, when, as president, Hayes promptly made good on the secret pledges made during the electoral dispute to withdraw federal troops from states still under military occupation and thus end the era of Reconstruction. Thereafter the Democrats came to dominate what became known as the “Solid South.”"

https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1876/The-disputed-election