The software is called "Facewatch" and is shared across stores. A 62 year old woman was put on the list for the crime of carrying Paracetamol.

Employees of a store you return an item to who are aggrieved can also have your face added to the list for "aggressive behaviour," which has also happened.

Spiteful people are putting little old ladies on the facial recognition database so they can't go shopping. This WILL also be done to punish ethnically British people through ethnic spite. Stores with all Indian staff are a common sight in London.

If we take elite theory as a given, and we understand that The Managerial Elite are insulated even from non elite wealthy people as a class.

Elite is not a merit signifier. It is not a wealth signifier. You can be a poor, stupid part of the elite class yet still have greater connections & access than a multi millionaire.

Where then do we find a way to interact with these people? Something we've dubbed The Managerial Interface.

Within "The Managerial Interface" is the only place mixing of elite & non elites happens at scale. The elite is also a social scene, and many within its lower end do not understand they are mixing almost exclusively with other minor elites.

People from middle-class technical backgrounds are commissioned into these managerial positions, but do not become elites in the class sense.

Minor elites are seconded, often begrudgingly, to be handlers to these necessary technical experts. It's a promotion for proles, but a demotion to many in the elite.

As above, so below. The Elite have their own insulated class of elites who are decisionary. The Sovereign Elite is as distant to the rest of the elite as the elites are to The Mass.

They control those who choose the people to pull the managerial levers. They gatekeep the gatekeepers of management & set the shape of The System. They decide what is "Neutral & Normal." They are the exception of the exception.

The elite, even at the very top, are a class. As such, the 80/20 rule applies as it applies to all groups & organisations. Elite overproduction makes this more like a 90/10 rule, with the vast majority of The Elite Class sitting idle or on Elite Welfare from NGOs, Civil Service, Think Tanks etc.

They are idle to a degree & in ways Victorian & medieval elites were not.

Minor elites have no access directly the sovereign elites. Elite loyalist placed in positions of mid level responsibility strive to reach the rarefied air of The Sovereign Elie and act as a ruthless filter. Michael Gove is, in my mind, thr ultimate archetype of The Striving Elite. They alone make entryism laughable, but there are dozens more filters that make that a pipe dream.

The Sovereign elite choose those who choose those who choose managerial workers.

If interlopers do make it into the lower structures, each tier above it can intervene. An intervention down at The Managerial Interface where the technical work is done carries enormous weight. You aren't winning if a mid-level or high-level elite decides you are history.

They also make sure to keep an insulation layer of idiots to protect their positions.

Sown up top to bottom.

Under socialism, property was abolished; under liberalism, it is socialized upward.

Administrative Fiat Autopoiesis:
The system reproduces its own truth.

The regime does not aim at order; it aims at manageability.
Chaos among the governed justifies endless managerial intervention.

The Soviet citizen could at least measure himself against a declared myth...
The Western subject measures himself against nothing stable at all, only the pulse of managerial approval.
That is why, despite open borders, many feel as if they live inside something—
an empire of soft coercion that does not even claim to be right.

Discussing AnCap borders + civilizational nationalism

First topic has been
AnCap as a historical comparison
Feudalism vs. Bureaucracy, 1000+ years of history, forms of pre-statist kingdoms, modern systems.

Second topic
Civilizational-nationalism
Ethnos, nation, people, civilization.
Regulating [market] institutions
Assimilation? Alien peoples? By what interpretation?

Do you have a positive obligation to the truth?

I.e. ought it be a crime to deny objective reality?

I do believe it is wrong to invalidate objective reality. To execute unjustifiable action(s).